From 4789df803aba25340ebe0eaf472ad22bd92d7f96 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Runxi Yu
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0000
Subject: pack: Use a Go map with a mutex instead of a sync.Map for packfiles

Very few writes, you don't typically see more than a dozen packfiles.
A ton of reads. Go maps are the obvious choice.
---
 pack_pack.go | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)

(limited to 'pack_pack.go')

diff --git a/pack_pack.go b/pack_pack.go
index 5c2c8628..d7b565f5 100644
--- a/pack_pack.go
+++ b/pack_pack.go
@@ -570,3 +570,27 @@ func (pf *packFile) cursor(ofs uint64) (io.Reader, error) {
 	}
 	return bytes.NewReader(pf.data[ofs:]), nil
 }
+
+func (repo *Repository) packFile(rel string) (*packFile, error) {
+	repo.packFilesMu.RLock()
+	pf, ok := repo.packFiles[rel]
+	repo.packFilesMu.RUnlock()
+	if ok {
+		return pf, nil
+	}
+
+	pf, err := openPackFile(repo.repoPath(rel), rel)
+	if err != nil {
+		return nil, err
+	}
+
+	repo.packFilesMu.Lock()
+	if existing, ok := repo.packFiles[rel]; ok {
+		repo.packFilesMu.Unlock()
+		_ = pf.Close()
+		return existing, nil
+	}
+	repo.packFiles[rel] = pf
+	repo.packFilesMu.Unlock()
+	return pf, nil
+}
-- 
cgit v1.3.1-10-gc9f91